>based upon the fact that paul tends to use military style ammo(m855/m193) and despises so called "hyper ammo" it's probable that these were used in this test
>tests multiple kinds of shot and only one unspecified kind of 5.56 ammo >Frankly, watching paul harrell design a test that is clearly invalid due to it's nature, but just so inherently believable for the morons who proliferate this community by it's appeal to classic fudd logic is one of the few reasons i get out of bed in the morning
Im assuming you meant to reply to >34706061Īnd somehow managed to fail at that much as you have at reading my explanation and applying it to paul's arguments They'll just accuse you of nitpicking and talk down to you like your some kind of over educated and under experience college boy, or act like his egregious errors and obvious lack of understanding of the underlying principles involved in matters of ballistics simply don't mean anything.įrankly, watching paul harrell design a test that is clearly invalid due to it's nature, but just so inherently believable for the morons who proliferate this community by it's appeal to classic fudd logic is one of the few reasons i get out of bed in the morning.
I've tried to explain before about how some of his tests are slanted, misleading, or so poorly constructed as to be meaningless but the kind of people posting in these threads are by nature of wanting to post in here the kinds of idiots who can't understand your points. Paul threads have been a pretty popular recent fad on /k/ and the kind of idiots that post here really like the dude.
0 kommentar(er)
